The following article was published on the vidi-yo site in 2001.
The aesthetics of underscan: resolution artefacts as art.
This article discusses the problems often experienced by VJs working with scan line converters, what some different scan line converters (in-built & external) offer in features and quality, what to look for and how to use them. It also discusses an approach to appreciation of underscan versus overscan, determining what is quality and what isn't in 'output aesthetics'.
INTRODUCTION
To create and output video sequences, a VJ (visual jammer, video performance artist or act) may be using videocassettes, DVD, video effects and mixing devices, and a computer (probably a laptop for portability). You'd probably think it was simple to connect all of these video-outputting devices together but it can be quite a challenge.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PAL AND COMPUTER VIDEO SIGNAL
In Australia, all video devices operate on the PAL standard, which
is 768 pixels wide and 576 pixels high. PAL video devices automatically
output a
video signal
that conforms to this standard. Computers and laptops however, use
a different
standard (VGA and supersets of VGA) to output images and signals to
screen. This is because computers output video that is designed to be displayed
on a computer monitor, and is quite different to a normal video signal.
The main differences between the computer video signal and PAL video
signal are:
scan rate
Normal video signal is blitted to a screen in a series
of zigzag lines, 50 Hz (times per second). Computer video scan happens
more
rapidly,
from 65 Hz up to 100 Hz and higher. The horizontal scan rate (the left
to right motion) is also faster in computers than in normal video.
screen dimension
Standard PAL is 768 pixels wide and 576 pixels
high. The computer signal may be anything from 640 x 480, 800 x 600
up to 1920
x 1440
or more.
encoding
Computer signal is divided into separate red, green, blue,
and sync elements, which the computer monitor neatly puts back together
in the
display. Video signal has all of these elements already combined in
composite video signal.
interlacing
Video signal blits each frame in two passes (odd field
and even field) and the 50 passes in PAL makes up the 25 interlaced
frames of PAL video.
Computers however don't interlace their frames, each frame is a discreet
pass of video. (newer video standards such as HD-TV are non-interlaced,
but let's
not go there!).
underscan
Images on a television (ie, normal video signal) go past
the edge of the screen, and there are some parts which are part of
the scan
but you
just don't see them because they are outside the edge. This is known
as overscan (the scan gies over the edge). Images on a computer screen
have
a definite
border, and is inside the edge of the monitor. This is known as underscan.
To match PAL video signal and computer video output, you need to convert
the computer signal to normal video, using a scan line converter.
SCAN LINE CONVERTERS
Scan line converters are a piece of hardware that converts the signal
from computer video to normal PAL (or other video standards).
Internal Scan line converters do the same job, but are built-in to
the computer, and may be a video card, or a built-in scan line converter
so that the computer
can output normal PAL video signal. If your laptop has an in-built
scan
line converter, it will have an RCA composite video jack or S-Video
jack that
is designed to output standard video.
External Scan line converters are designed to plug in to the computer monitor jack of a computer, and usually also require extra power and cables.
Features vary amongst different brands and models, and some examples
include:
- conversion from computer signal to PAL and/or NTSC (US / japanese
format) video signal, or back the other way,
- ability to zoom in on part of the computer signal and convert it
to full screen video,
- some special effects, such as dissolve or chromakey, or titles,
- genlocking (syncing two different video signals together so that
each frame begins at the same moment).
You may be thinking of connecting your computer directly into a video projector, to obtain the highest quality signal - knowing that most video projectors are capable of displaying computer signal (this is known as data projection). However not all data projectors are capable of all resolutions or colour depths, meaning that work you have designed to be output at 1024 x 768 (for example) cannot be displayed.
Computer signal is carried using VGA cables that are expensive (compared to cables designed to carry normal PAL video signal) and not very long, limiting how far your laptop can be from the projector. In a situation where the visual jammer is working on stage and the projector is front of house, some 6 to 25 metres away and 4 metres in the air, a standard 3 metre VGA cable will not reach. And permanent installations make this situation even more impractical.
Finally, in many cases a VJ will be expected to patch their equipment into a video system such as professional mixers or matrix switcher, which will only accept composite or S-Video signal. Therefore, it is in the VJ's best interest to have an external or in-built scan line converter, to produce a standard PAL video signal which can easily be plugged into video equipment.
THE MAJOR SCAN CONVERSION ISSUES
No matter whether dealing with an in-built or an external scan line
converter, there are several issues which are typical for the VJ.
In general, the quality of a computer video signal will be much higher than standard video, and converting a computer video signal will mean a loss of crispness. For example, text that has been produced on a computer video monitor set to a high resolution will appear fuzzy and dull when converted to standard video. For this reason, it is wise to test and check images and designs created on a computer monitor during the production process, to alter them if necessary so that the conversion process will not reduce the legilibity or colour so much. Don't assume that what you see on your computer monitor will look the same once converted to standard video.
Underscan and Overscan. Because of the difference in scan size between video and computer signal, the processing of underscan and overscan is a critical issue. When computer signal is converted to standard video, in underscan mode, a black border will appear around the edge of the image. This is less an issue when this image is the only source, but when it is mixed or juxtaposed with other video signal, the black border will appear as a definite edge on many projections. Many Scan line converters have overscan or scaling functions which should overcome this problem, but many scan line converters are unable to properly scale to full screen overscan (even if they advertise overscan) – meaning that the black border can’t be hidden or removed.
Resolution and Window Size. Many VJs work with applications that
don't display full screen video, but instead present a 320x240 sized
window
in one corner
with control panels around it. Converting the full screen display
would be a problem as you only want the active window to be shown.
The scan
line converter
needs to be able to zoom up on specific display window and display
that as a full overscan image (768 x 675 pixels). Many scan line
converters aren't
capable of zooming, or don't offer precise enough control to scan
just the active window. Others which are capable of zoom, require
the zoom
to be set
up afresh each time, which is a nuisance in a live context. Ideally
the
scan line converter should allow the setting to be saved and easily
recalled.
Accessories. Some scan line converters are programmed through on
screen menus or remote controls. Onscreen menus require a monitor
that is
separate to
the mix (so that setting up won't have to be done on the main screen).
And remotes
have a tendency to get lost!
Flicker is a feature of normal video signal - created by subtle differences between interlaced odd and even fields of frames. A scan line converter takes a non-interlaced video signal and creates an interlaced signal. Low end scan line converters do this by duplicating every second frame, more expensive scan line converters apply other processes which give a higher quality motion but may soften other aspects of the image. This is a consideration for computer video signal designed to be interlaced (such as some 3D packages).
The scan line converter may be supplied and set up for the VJ at some major events, but this does not necessarily mean it has been set up according to your needs. Overscan SHOULD have been set up as the default (but it is wise to check as this may have been forgotten). If you require part-screen zooming, you should speak with the events AV tech director about creating presets before the event begins. Considering that the scan line converter may have been hired in for the day, the AV tech team may not be well versed in its use, so allow plenty of time for set up.
THE AESTHETICS OF UNDERSCAN
When viewing an image onscreen produced by a VJ, it's often possible to tell the method of production, left by tell tale signs.
For example, you can easily spot a VJ using a mixer to dissolve back and forth from overscanned video to underscanned computer signal, because the rectangular frame of the image will appear to grow and shrink slightly. With some video source material this may appear to be an attractive aspect, but in general it seems to reinforce the rectangularity of the projection.
In circumstances where the VJ is not mixing back and forth between two sources, but instead has an underscan and overscan image dissolved together or keyed together, the image will appear to be of two images, one being in a rectangle slightly smaller than the other. This can be quite displeasing to the eye if the images are organic, soft images, as the hard rectangular outline slightly inside the frame tends to override the softer qualities.
The above problems appear worse if the underscan is off centre. If you are bothered by the mismatch of normal video signal, and your scan line converters inefficient overscan, you can hide the overscan border in the projection. To do this, set the projector image to be slightly larger than the screen, so that the border spills over the edge. This works well when the screen is suspended, or against a dark wall.
A VJ who is using an iterative content production technique (that
is, mixing work, recording it, and then using that recording as
a layer
within a mix)
and displaying the underscan / overscan issue will present three
or more "inner
rectangles" which may all be slightly off centre from each
other. By counting the number of different rectangles, you can
gauge how many
iterations have
been through to create that particular mix.
There is a point in an iterative content production technique in
which the underscan rectangle actually becomes a feature of the
work rather
than a
detriment to it. The gap between underscan and overscan rectangles
takes on a life, and
history of its own, separate to the aesthetic of the rest of the
frame.
BUYING A SCAN LINE CONVERTER
You do get what you pay for in scan line converters...
Cheap to medium quality: $100 - $800
high end: $800 - $3000 plus
Broadcast quality: $4000 plus
Bottom end of the range tend to have poorer conversion methods,
meaning that the converted image will be less crisp and readable,
They tend
to support
less resolutions, and the resolutions supported may be clipped
(see the aesthetics of underscan). Low end scan line converters
may also
be operating
in fewer
colours, sampling image colours in only hundreds or thousands
of colours (much
less than normal video). Better quality scan line converters
will tend to have better colour handling, offer higher resolution processing,
and will
also have
better "anti-flicker filtering" for creating interlaced
video signal.
Before you purchase a scan line converter, check:
- what us the resolution and refresh rate you use on your computer;
Make sure that the scan converter supports it.
- does the scan line converter support the video standard you
need? It is very important to check the quality of the video
signal.
Lower end
scan line
converters
may output a substandard or low quality signal which may not
be apparent when displayed on a TV, but which may be a problem
for
older or professional
quality
equipment. For example, the Panasonic WJ-MX50 and MX12 mixers
are renown for "allergic
reactions" to substandard video signal output by low end scan
converters.
- Does the scan line converter have the appropriate outputs?
For example, does it supply PAL, composite, or PAL S-Video.
S-Video carries separate
colour and
brightness signals, and is used on most pro-sumer equipment
because of its superior quality. High end scan converters may
also offer
a component
video
option (signal is split into red green and blue) which is used
in some high end broadcast applications.
- How many colours does the converter support? Normal video
signal displays millions of colours, whereas a computer video
signal
may be output at
anywhere from 8 colours, through thousands to millions of colours.
Not all converters
support a good quality colour conversion process. Some claim
to be 24 bit (thousands of colours) but actually downsample
the image
before
converting
to video. Check
that the unit offers "bit sampling and processing" for
24 bit colour.
- samples per line. The scan line converter samples pixels
across each horizontal scan line of the computer signal. A
low sample
rate means
a fuzzier signal,
higher will be crisper. Bottom end scan converters should offer
at least 640 samples per line.
- Anti flicker options. Low-end scan converters reduce flicker
by duplicating frames to create odd and even fields. High-end
converters create unique
fields but use other methods to reduce flicker. Flicker may
be an
issue for you
if your computer images include motion or stripes.
- Underscan and Overscan. A computer signal is normally displayed
underscan, but when converted to normal video signal, menu
bars and items at the
edge of screen may disappear outside the edge of the screen.
This is because
normal video is overscan. A scan line converter should offer
both overscan and underscan
modes. But be careful - some offer underscan as the default,
and the overscan version is lesser in quality, or worse yet,
may not
go right
to the edge.
Or if overscan is the default, the underscan may be poorer
in quality and not
centred on screen. You need your computer signal to be able
to be converted to full overscan, 768 x 576 pixels to the edge,
to ensure
that it perfectly
matches the scan size of normal video.
- Zooming, Magnification, Position options. Some scan converters
allow you to zoom in on part of the computer image. Low end
scan converters
offer a
simple 1X, 2X, magnification with rudimentary positioning (eg
top left or bottom right).
But for many software applications the part of screen you may
want to zoom up on is in a particular part of frame and needs
more magnification
control.
Middle range scan line converters allow you to specify the
exact dimensions, and save it as a preset, so you can easily
jump backwards
and forwards
from full screen mode. High end scan converters may also offer
a continuous linear
zoom magnification that maintains the aspect ratio throughout
the zoom.
- Genlock. A genlock allows you to take two sources and synchronise
the signals to each other, which may be useful if you are working
with other
technologies
(such as mixers) which require all signals to be synced. When
looking at Genlock features, check which signal is the "sync source",
and whether that is an option you can set. Ideally your genlocking
scan converter should also
offer options to adjust both horizontal and subcarrier signal timing.
- Other features. Scan converters offer a variety of features
depending on manufacturer, including:
test pattern
signal adjustment
remote control or rs-232 control
other formats (eg computer to PAL, NTSC, VGA, XVGA, component)
special effects (eg still or image freeze mode, dissolve, chroma
key)
sleep
Other accessories (manuals, cables, rackmount options)
- The manufacturer. Is the company a flybynighter or a reliable
company with reasonable history, and what is the manufacturer
offering in
terms of Warranty
and Support for service and repairs.
Written by Cindi Drennan, 2001